A Teacher’s Letter to the Editor: FEA Lawsuit – Pensions in Florida

My Letter to the Editor – Florida:

There is much talk lately about pensions. Our governor would like us to believe this talk is about fairness. Why should the private sector have to pay into their pensions while the public sector doesn’t? Those were his words, I believe. Well, let us look at this statement? I think when we do, we will realize that it is a lose / lose for both sides, public and private.

First of all, let’s look at the public side. Public employees must be enrolled in the Florida Retirement System (FRS). It is not optional. We have no choice. FRS is our only option. Well, that doesn’t sound fair, you say. Maybe not… maybe 401ks and other retirement options would better suit our needs. Yet, we have a reason for staying where we are with our FRS pensions. We have collective bargaining written into our State Constitution. That gives us the ability to negotiate our own pensions and FRS. And, be not confused,  we have negotiated away much of our salaries over the years, just to maintain those pensions. Our choice … our right.

The Florida Legislature’s recent passing of changes to our FRS, requiring employee contribution, was done without the consult of its members: us public employees. Changes were made without collective bargaining. That takes away our only choice and violates the rights protected by our Constitution. Lose.

Now, let’s look at the private sector perspective. Private employees have some choices. They may choose a retirement plan and set it up or they may chose not to. Some employers may match, some may not. Private sector employees usually know this info before the interview.  You factor such info into your selection of employers. Right? Well, that seems fair. You bargain for yourself. Yes, it might be nice to have a collective supporting you, like us public employees, but that is your choice as well… isn’t it?

So, how are changes to public FRS a ‘lose’ for the private sector? It is simple. While our options of retirement plans may differ, our choice of the Constitution does not. And just as easily as they manipulate our State Constitution to remove the fair rights of public employees, they will do so to manipulate the rights of the private sector. I can hear their argument now:  ‘If public employees have to pay into a retirement plan, shouldn’t the private?’ Can’t you just hear the statement released from the governor’s office, somewhere down the road … ‘Fair is fair, right?’

Not so much. Forced privatization of pensions, public or private, by the government is not an option … it is a tax.  Lose / Lose.

Let us also not forget: our Florida FRS is doing very well. It is one of the best in the nation. I know our State Constitution says FRS modifications must be made on ‘sound actuarial basis’. Basically, FRS must be in the red. It is not.  Yet, our governor would like us to ignore that line in the State Constitution and let them decide what is fair. I say not. I will stick with the Constitution, thank you very much, Sir.  Fair is collective bargaining. Fair is due process and the right to my personal property. That is fair for public and private.

Those in charge might hope to pit the public sector against the private sector as they do what they please… but we know better.  We are pretty sure our Florida Courts know better, as well. I congratulate our teachers union, FEA, for initiating a lawsuit to review the Constitutionality of these changes to our pension. By doing so, they are protecting the Constitution for us all.

I will end with this thought: Our governor recently released a form letter for our use when writing these letters to the editors. He praised himself as ‘refreshing.’ I chose not to use his form letter when writing this one.

My apologies, Sir. Fair is fair…


5 thoughts on “A Teacher’s Letter to the Editor: FEA Lawsuit – Pensions in Florida

  1. Yes, I definitely agree. The reasoning is very cogent–especially the paragraph about how it is “lose” for the private sector. Very compelling and insightful

  2. The more I reread this blog, the more the reasoning becomes clear and more sound. I think the best part was how you explained and predicted that they will manipulate the fair rights of the private sector following the manipulation of the state constitution.

    A little bit of a straw man here:

    – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

    I can hear their argument now: ‘If public employees have to pay into a retirement plan, shouldn’t the private?’ Can’t you just hear the statement released from the governor’s office, somewhere down the road … ‘Fair is fair, right?’

    – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

    Other than that, the rest of your post is pretty solid & logic-proof.

  3. Sorry, I don’t know if I’m allowed to post here because I’m also a teacher but when I found out that there is an insightful blog post with sound reasoning and logic-proof dwellings, then I had to see it for myself. They were right–the logic of the private sector comparison paragraph alone blew me away and shocked me. I’m thinking if the FEA could make arguments as clear & convincing as what I’ve read today, then we wouldn’t have a budget problem. We would have a new governor, and a new & larger audience. I’m inviting my friends who work in the private sector to add twitter onto your facebook in this blog. Keep up the good work! Let us keep hearing more broader appeal so that we may win over our non-union brethren and unite with the courts and we proud teachers!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s